Discussion+Board+Assessment+Criteria

Criteria** || **Non-proficient** detail. The few details that are included are not well organized. || Some of the details in the post pertain to the thesis but the organization may not make the meaning hard to follow. || Most of the details in the post pertain to the thesis and are organized to present the intended meaning. More detail may be needed to explain the points. || Details are selected and organized so that the main idea of the post is presented in a logical method. Enough detail needed to explain the ideas fully. ||
 * **media type="file" key="assessment.wav"
 * Performance 0** || **Basic Performance 1** || **Proficient**
 * Performance 2** || **Distinguished**
 * Performance 3** ||
 * **Selects,**
 * organizes, and**
 * presents**
 * details to**
 * support a main**
 * idea** || The post lacks
 * **Applies relevant**
 * Professional and/or**
 * personal**
 * experiences where appropriate.** || Does not apply relevant professional and/or personal experiences where appropriate. || Applies an example of professional and/or personal experience but the experience is not appropriate or tied to the main idea being discussed. || Applies an example of professional and/or personal experience and begins to relate it to course concepts. || Applies an example of professional and/or personal experience and relates it to course concepts to expand the conversation. ||
 * **Responds to**
 * fellow**
 * learners,**
 * relating the**
 * discussion**
 * to relevant**
 * course**
 * concepts**
 * and**
 * providing**
 * substantive**
 * feedback.** || Does not respond to fellow learners. || Responds to fellow learners but does not add new information to the conversation. || Responds to fellow learners providing some additional information to the conversation || Responds to fellow learners and ties the course concepts to the post and provides feedback to the learners. ||